Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph Meyer's avatar

Thanks for this excellent review. Also, I appreciate you raising questions about the Harrow findings, which one would expect if patients stop taking their antipsychotics when their psychosis goes into remission (rather than patients experiencing remission as a result of discontinuing antipsychotics).

As the parent of an adult with an early-onset psychotic disorder, I have noted changes of opinion over the past 20 years that often seem as driven by popular psychology as tied to strong evidence. Should antipsychotics be prescribed in the prodromal stages as a hypothetical preventative, or does that risk putting patients who may never develop a psychotic disorder on unnecessary medication? Claims about the effects of antipsychotics have varied from them needing to be taken lifelong (as already noted and critiqued in this article); to being necessary as an intervention against kindling of brain pathways (while some articles have found patient response to antipsychotics is not much worse among patients with longstanding untreated psychosis when compared to those who received early intervention); to being neuroprotective or even stimulating growth of grey matter; to disagreements about whether brain shrinkage is related to antipsychotic use or is a symptoms of the disease and even whether the amount of brain shrinkage is clinically significant (since patients with much more brain missing due to developmental variation or injury are doing just fine). Authors of journal articles reach different conclusions based on investigations of patients naive to antipsychotics, those using antipsychotics for a short time, and those with a history of longterm antipsychotic use. One article a number of years ago found higher-than-recommended doses of olanzapine to be similar in efficacy to clozapine. And a recent comparison of long-acting injectables found some to be statistically as efficacious as clozapine, making me wonder if the required monitoring of clozapine use is a partial explanation for its higher efficacy. Earlier this year, an article in the UK raised concerns about the elevated risk of sudden death associated with clozapine. If suicidal ideation is not an issue for a particular patient, if they have a strong family history of heart disease, and they are able to function despite the positive symptoms of psychosis, does that mean clozapine is counter-indicated due to its elevated risk of iatrogenic harm? It's a rhetorical question.

Similarly there have been disagreements about the pros and cons of mood stabilizers including lithium, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine with arguments that some are more effective than others, some may be neuroprotective, one or more may reduce suicidal ideation, and maybe some are more suitable for adults or children. Twenty years ago, popular thinking seemed to be that lithium was ineffective in children and carbamazepine must be used. A local residential treatment center was so enamored with oxcarbazepine a decade ago that they used it exclusively in their patients and often at doses much higher than manufacturer recommendations (which may be somewhat arbitrary). Similarly, while lithium has often been called the gold standard for mood stabilization, that position has been challenged by papers that disagree on whether it reduces suicidal thoughts, whether it is neuroprotective, and whether it causes kidney damage over time. Who should one believe?

Parents like me rub their heads and wonder how they are supposed to make an educated choice for the care of a family member--they can get a different opinion from each doctor they visit. Novice advocates and journalists read this stuff, choose their favorite journal article, and use it to make the policy arguments they prefer. This is one reason why it is impossible to agree on mental healthcare policy: We have advocates for medication, therapy, social supports, and so forth with academicians who hold terminal degrees in their fields disagreeing with one another. Anti-psychiatry activists including the Church of Scientology use these disagreements to malign the medical model and attack the entire medical speciality. The biggest losers are patients with the more serious and intractable psychiatric illnesses who are homeless on our streets and in our prison cells.

Expand full comment
Ronald W. Pies's avatar

Thank you for the thorough, balanced, and nuanced review, Awais!

For those of us who spent the bulk of our professional careers caring for severely ill patients with chronic schizophrenia [1], your conclusion is entirely on the mark; i.e.,

"If you go off antipsychotics that were effective for you, and they caused minimal side effects and you tolerated them well, and if you have a recurrent or chronic form of psychotic illness, then you are at a higher risk of experiencing future episodes/exacerbations of psychosis, and your functioning is likely negatively affected by discontinuation (i.e. the net effect of antipsychotics on your functioning is positive)."

Patients fitting this description should be encouraged to continue their antipsychotic medication, with careful attention paid to managing side effects; e.g., using the lowest effective dose of medication. I would also note the need for greater use of clozapine, which is known to reduce suicidality in schizophrenia and--in my experience--can vastly improve quality of life. Psychosocial treatments are also an important component of care, for patients with chronic schizophrenia.

One important study to consider is that of Beasley and colleagues. This 52-week, double-blind, relapse prevention trial tested whether stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment would experience greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment. The study found that, on average, Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale total scores improved by 4.3 ± 10.6 points during treatment with olanzapine (10 to 20 mg/d; n = 212), but decreased by 7.1 ± 14.6 points during treatment with placebo (n = 92; P < .001). The researchers also found that “. . . stable patients with schizophrenia who were taken off active drug treatment experienced no greater improvements in long-term quality of life than those who were continued on antipsychotic treatment, even in the absence of psychotic symptoms.” [2]

All that said, we need many more randomized, long-term studies of antipsychotic medication before reaching any confident conclusions of their long-term risks and benefits.

Ronald W. Pies, MD

1. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/quality-life-and-case-antipsychotics

2. Beasley CM Jr, Sutton VK, Taylor CC, et al. Is quality of life among minimally symptomatic patients with schizophrenia better following withdrawal or continuation of antipsychotic treatment? J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;26:40-44.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts